Tuesday, March 7

Göz Lokum


Above is Academia del natural (1887, oil on linen, Valencia, Museo de Bellas Artes de Valencia en su Historia) by Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida (1863 – 1923), a Spanish painter often erroneously grouped with the Impressionists.

There is something undeniably erotic about this work. It’s not simply the leanness of the subject’s physique and the beauty of his exposed limbs. His passivity and his vulnerability are arousing. His posture suggests that he is bound, though there are no visible restraints. Is he a prisoner? Is he a slave? Has he been violated in some fashion? Is he awaiting some imminent dishonor? His semi-nude state adds to his vulnerability, the improvised nature of his garment suggesting that he has been stripped. His feet are dirty; yet he is otherwise unmarked, though there is what might be a bloodstain on his garment.

Perhaps what he has experienced then is not physical abuse, but disgrace of some kind. In 19th-century Spain, nothing would disgrace a man more than playing the passive role in a sexual encounter with another man. Being fucked, in other words. Is that what is being suggested here? That’s not to say that Sorolla was issuing any kind of moral judgment about homosexuality. Rather, he might have known that portraying a semi-nude male in such an abject position would evoke a tabooed homoeroticism and a forbidden act. Whether or not this was the artist’s intention is irrelevant in the end. The powerful image of shame combined with the subject’s lack of clothing easily ushers the viewer into the realm of the sexual.

Perhaps the painting is meant to inspire pity. I find that it also inspires desire. I wonder if Sorolla was cognizant of this possibility. This does not seem to be fundamentally different than asking whether or not those who painted Saint Sebastian or the Sacrifice of Isaac were aware of the erotic quality of their works. Perhaps the potent eroticism of those works is more acceptable because, for the most part, the subjects appear to be passionless—to a great extent, they transcend the suffering that is being portrayed. The figure in Academia del natural, on the other hand, conveys not passionlessness, but great pathos. Although his face is largely hidden from view, the subject appears very much present in his vulnerability. Perhaps it is his slumped shoulders or his downcast look. Whatever it is, his is an uneasy eroticism.

To me, this work seems to be more than a mere figure study. At the very least, for a figure study, it possesses an element bordering on the fetishistic and kinky. The combination of all of the features working together—his youthful beauty, his posture, his garment, his vulnerability—all hint at the possibility of the subject’s status as a sexual object. While all nudes, to some extent, turn the viewer into a voyeur, Academia del natural, despite the fact that its subject is not nude, goes further by suggesting taboos and possible exploitation, which leave the viewer feeling guilty and uncomfortable, yet unmistakably titillated.

5 Comments:

Blogger Cairo The Boxer said...

woof woof

12:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another reading, perhaps one drawn from more direct, literal observation and less from interpretation: A boy at rest, absorbed, abstracted wholly unselfconsciously in a thought or perhaps in the noticing of something small and insignificant -- an insect on the floor perhaps? It is the luxury of allowing the viewer's eye to appraise him and every detail about him, in this moment of blessed relaxed passive existance, in all his vulnerable, unguarded physicality, with no screens or barriers that renders this image highly erotic -- and the experience of it possibly a voyeuristic pleasure. That body beautifully appearing in total languor, hands openly rested behind his back might quickly tense and assume posture or pose the moment the viewer were noticed. Adding to the mood of the piece is the pensive, serious, indeed 'dignified' or 'noble' head and face, suggesting a very interesting and poignant contrast to the unstudied lassitude of the body and limbs, the dirty feet and the highly 'circumstantial' /improvised quality of the garment worn. Beautiful image. Thanks for thoughtfully presenting it and encouraging us to have the careful look it invites and deserves. In an age of lurid effects, obsessed with all 'dynamic', a welcome pleasure.

5:26 AM  
Blogger The Persian said...

That work certainly is titillating. I remember your earlier mention of this artist. Such a beautiful oil.

:)

9:31 AM  
Blogger Sandouri Dean Bey said...

anonymous-
i like your comments and your analysis of this image better. i think that the hands behind the back is evocative of being bound, but i like your emphasis on contemplation. indeed, depending on the view (and viewer), there is an interesting tension between dignity vs. indignity, nobility vs. disgrace. thanks for commenting!

11:19 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Yes your right it is very erotic.

3:28 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.

AMAN YALA CLAIMS NO CREDIT FOR ANY IMAGES FEATURED ON THIS SITE, UNLESS EXPRESSLY STATED. ALL VISUAL CONTENT IS COPYRIGHT TO ITS RESPECTFUL OWNERS. IF YOU OWN RIGHTS TO ANY OF THE IMAGES AND DO NOT WISH THEM TO APPEAR ON THIS SITE, PLEASE CONTACT ME VIA E-MAIL, AND THEY WILL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED.